PTI / Peptide Therapy Index

Research Index

Clinical and preclinical peptide therapy research — indexed by study type, assessed for evidence quality. Independent. No affiliates.

6 recent entries Full index →
Rct Evidence Research
What Do 2026 Primary Studies Show About GLP-1/GIP Dual Agonists Versus GLP-1 Monotherapy for Body-Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Outcomes?

The 2025 SURMOUNT-5 RCT established that tirzepatide produced approximately 20% mean body-weight reduction versus approximately 14% with semaglutide 2.4 mg over 72 weeks. Comparative cardiometabolic data show superior glycaemic control and lipid remodelling with dual agonism. Cardiovascular event data remain largely observational and directionally mixed in 2026.

July 29, 2026 · 11 min read
Preclinical Research Preclinical
Why Does BPC-157's Receptor-Orphan Status Block Rational Analogue Design — and What Does the 2026 Mateescu Review Say About the Clinical Trial Gap?

BPC-157 has no confirmed membrane receptor as of 2026. A 2026 review in Pharmaceutics by Mateescu and colleagues identifies this receptor-orphan status as the root obstacle to rational analogue design. Without a defined pharmacophore, structure–activity relationship studies cannot guide modifications improving half-life, permeability, or potency. Downstream signalling through Egr-1, FAK–paxillin, and VEGFR2 is characterised, but the upstream receptor remains unknown.

July 28, 2026 · 10 min read
Rct Evidence Research
Does Amyloid-β Immunotherapy Meaningfully Alter Cognitive Decline in Early Alzheimer's Disease — What Do the 2026 Trial Readouts Show?

As of 2026, two approved passive immunotherapies — lecanemab and donanemab — demonstrate statistically significant but modest slowing of cognitive decline in early Alzheimer's disease: 27% and 35% respectively on primary clinical scales versus placebo. Effect sizes are real but incremental, confined to amyloid-confirmed early-stage disease, and accompanied by clinically significant ARIA rates that constrain patient selection.

July 27, 2026 · 11 min read
Rct Evidence Research
Why Does DunedinPACE Detect Semaglutide's Anti-Aging Signal When Other Epigenetic Clocks Miss It — What Do the 2026 HIV and SLIM LIVER Trials Reveal?

Two 2025–2026 studies — a 32-week RCT in adults with HIV-associated lipohypertrophy and a 24-week pilot in MASLD patients — both detected semaglutide's anti-aging signal primarily through DunedinPACE, a pace-of-aging clock built from longitudinal physiological data. Its structural design makes it uniquely sensitive to short-duration interventions, explaining a ~9% deceleration where cross-sectional age-estimate clocks showed weaker effects.

July 22, 2026 · 10 min read
Preclinical Research Preclinical
What Did the July 2026 FDA PCAC Review Conclude About BPC-157's Biopharmaceutical Data Gaps and 503A Compounding Eligibility?

At its July 23–24, 2026 meeting, the FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) recommended against adding BPC-157 to the 503A Bulks List, citing three biopharmaceutical deficiencies: injectable immunogenicity risk, uncharacterised peptide impurity profiles, and an absence of clinical safety data — gaps catalogued independently in the 2026 Pharmaceutics review by Mateescu et al. (doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18050625).

July 21, 2026 · 9 min read
Preclinical Research Preclinical
Why Does Semaglutide's Oral Bioavailability Remain Below 1% Despite SNAC, and What Novel 2026 Formulation Strategies Propose to Fix It?

A 2026 review in Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery identifies three sequential gastrointestinal barriers as the principal reasons oral semaglutide bioavailability remains approximately 0.4 to 1 percent despite SNAC co-formulation. Acid-mediated unfolding, pepsin proteolysis, and low epithelial permeability each require distinct mechanistic solutions. The review proposes ionic-liquid enteric systems, lipid nanocarriers, and extracellular vesicle platforms as targeted responses.

July 16, 2026 · 9 min read

The Peptide Therapy Index catalogues primary-source research on peptide therapies — clinical trials, preclinical studies, and evidence reviews — assessed for study type and quality. Every entry identifies whether the underlying evidence is from randomised controlled trials, animal models, case series, or review syntheses.

No commercial affiliations. No advertising. No supplements sold. Editorial standards →